My Comments: For most of my adult life, the major player among brokerage firms in the US was Merrill Lynch. Actually I remember it as Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith.
Then the crash happened in the fall of 2008 and Bank of America acquired ML on 1/1/2009. The cynic in me said that BoA saw an opportunity to further rip off middle America and what better way to do that than to purchase ML’s 100 plus year client base and reputation.
Not to say that there aren’t some ethical professionals working there but it’s long been my position that if you as a client of theirs makes any money, that’s an incidental benefit since the primary goal is to make money for BoA.
So, here we are with BoA telling the world that the great bull market that has now set records since March of 2009 is ‘dead’. They may very well be right. What does that mean for you if in fact that prediction plays out?
by Jeff Cox, Finance Editor @CNBC 9/19/2018
The “Great Bull” market that came after the financial crisis is dead due to slowing economic growth, rising interest rates and too much debt, according to a Bank of America Merrill Lynch analysis.
In its place will be one that features lower returns, the bulk of which will be concentrated in assets that suffered during the recovery, Michael Hartnett, BofAML’s chief investment strategist, said in a wide-ranging note looking at markets 10 years after the collapse of Lehman Brothers.
“The Great Bull Dead: end of excess liquidity = end of excess returns,” Hartnett said.
The liquidity reference is to central banks that have pumped in $12 trillion worth in various easing programs that have seen 713 interest rate cuts around the world, according to Merrill Lynch. Leading the way has been the U.S. Federal Reserve, which kept its benchmark interest rate anchored near zero for seven years and pumped up its own balance sheet to more than $4.5 trillion at one point.
All that stimulus has led to a 335 percent surge in the S&P 500 since the crisis lows.
But as the Fed and others end asset purchases and gradually raise rates, investors will have to brace for significant changes, Hartnett wrote.
In that climate, he advised investors to focus on “inequality, innovation and immortality,” that would benefit pharma companies and technology disruptors, along with inflation plays in commodities, value stocks, and markets outside the U.S. and Canada.
“The Fed is now in the midst of a tightening cycle, ignoring structural deflation, focusing on cyclical inflation,” he said. “Until this Fed hiking cycle ends we suspect absolute returns from financial assets will remain slim & volatile.”
The low interest rates and aggressive easing programs fueled a massive run-up in global debt — from $172 trillion pre-crisis to $247 trillion now. Chinese debt rose 460 percent to $40 trillion, global government debt is up 73 percent to $67 trillion, and total U.S. government debt has soared nearly 82 percent since the Sept. 15, 2008, implosion of Lehman, the flashpoint for a crisis that had been brewing for years.
Investors used to central bank largess are now underestimating the Fed’s resolve to normalize policy, Hartnett said. The central bank has raised rates seven times since December 2015 and is on track for two more hikes before year’s end.
Echoing concerns heard across Wall Street, Hartnett noted that additional increases could cause short-term government bond yields to eclipse longer-term rates, a condition known as an inverted yield curve that has preceded each of the past seven recessions.
“Yet the Fed is now saying ‘this time is different’ and a flat/inverted curve won’t stop them hiking,” he said. “A much more hawkish-than-expected Fed is the most likely catalyst for fresh losses across asset markets.”
There have been market disruptions that could get worse: Hartnett called cryptocurrency bitcoin the “biggest bubble ever” that has room for further losses.
The latest leg of the bull market has been fueled by last year’s tax cuts that also contributed to soaring corporate earnings along with a fresh round of share buybacks that is expected to eclipse $1 trillion this year. Buybacks have totaled $4.7 trillion since the crisis.
However, Harnett worries that the fiscal easing has contributed to “polarization” in markets that has seen U.S. performance surge and decouple from weakening global markets. The last two instances of significant fiscal stimulus ended with “currency overvaluation, domestic overheating, and massive schisms in global markets.”
Hartnett advises investors to watch bank stocks, which have pushed higher along with interest rates. If that relationship breaks down, it would signal a larger negative impact from Fed tightening.