How a Reverse Mortgage Can Benefit You in Retirement

My Comments: Being alive carries with it certain risks. Some can be managed and some cannot. Running out of money in retirement is a risk you want to avoid if you can. To the extent you have been able to pay off a home mortgage or otherwise find yourself with an equity position, sometime a reverse mortgage can be a useful tool.

When my wife and I downsized our house a few years ago, we also arranged for a reverse mortgage. We continue to pay for homeowners insurance and our property taxes.

If we do it correctly, there’s little risk and the third bedroom can pay for other things over time. It’s not for everyone, but to turn your back on the idea is foolish.

by Jarrett Topel, CFP  \ November 16, 2017

There are few terms in the finance industry more reviled in the minds of the general public than reverse mortgage. However, as is often the case in the world of finance, long-held perceptions and biases are not always reflective of the financial reality of today’s economy and, as a result, can be counter-productive. Regardless of what you think you know about reverse mortgages, and barring some new revolutionary change in the world of retirement income sources, these products will likely be an absolute must for many Americans in the coming years. Therefore, it is a mistake for retirees and pre-retirees to shun this option without doing some research. By gaining a deeper knowledge about how they work, they can determine if a reverse mortgage might have some value for them going forward.

To understand today’s environment, we first take a brief trip into the past. Since the days of the homesteaders, the family-owned house has been the quintessential icon of security and prosperity in our nation. It was a tangible asset that protected us from the elements, was a gathering and living place for our extended families, and said something about our social class in society. Our home (or quite often, farm) was the place where several generations lived, worked and cared for each other. Wives and daughters often stayed in the home and took care of parents and grandparents as they aged. In this environment, the idea that the house could provide an income stream in retirement never even occurred to people. They were able to live off what they produced or worked to earn, and they had enough family members at home to care for the elders when they could no longer work. Also, life expectancies were so much shorter that planning for a 20-, 30- or even 40-year retirement was completely unnecessary. (For related reading, see: Retirement Planning for a 115-Year Life Expectancy.)

How Homeownership and Retirement Have Changed

Today, things look very different. Rarely do we see children living with aged parents or grandparents anymore. Wives and daughters are not expected to stay home to care for their elders, but to become a part of the workforce. Homes are infrequently held for many generations, instead they are sold on average every 5.9 years. In the past 100 years, life expectancies have increased by over 30 years, resulting in the need to acquire significantly more assets to fund these non-working years. At the same time, we now have fewer (or at least less reliable) income sources to provide this funding. Defined-benefit pensions have mostly gone the way of the dodo. We’re constantly told that Social Security is in serious trouble. Bonds and CDs pay very little interest and may experience significant drops in value when interest rates eventually start to climb back toward their historic norms. All these factors have combined to make preparing for a lengthy retirement harder and more frustrating than ever.

Using Your Home as a Financial Asset

For a great many people, having their largest asset just sit there throughout their 30-year retirement, doing nothing other than providing shelter (and a nice inheritance for their children once they’re gone), makes no financial sense at all.

Our home, no matter how much we may love it, is just another of our financial assets, and for many, far and away our largest. Those fortunate enough to have other assets sufficient to see them through retirement, can choose to forego even considering a reverse mortgage (though it still may make statistical sense in many cases, depending on how their other assets are structured—more on that in a moment). However, for others this may not be feasible, and a great many will find themselves facing a tough choice between significantly cutting their living expenses in their latter years, or finding an alternate source of income.

With a reverse mortgage, they just might find the perfect solution by leveraging their home into that additional income stream they cannot outlive while being able to stay in their home as long as they are physically and mentally able. Because the industry is still basically in its infancy, and the structures of and rules surrounding these types of mortgages will undoubtedly change quickly, it will be imperative for consumers and financial advisors alike to stay abreast of all the specifics as the industry evolves. The devil, as always, is in the details and, as with any complex financial product, it is essential to perform thorough due diligence before making any decisions or recommendations. (For related reading, see: 5 Signs a Reverse Mortgage Is a Good Idea.)

Mitigating Sequence Risk

Perhaps the most valuable, and often overlooked aspect of the reverse mortgage, at least for those who seemingly have saved enough for retirement or perhaps are just on the edge, is its ability to help mitigate sequence risk. Sequence risk is the risk to a portfolio’s longevity that comes from having to take withdrawals when the portfolio is down significantly, especially in the early years of those scheduled withdrawals (i.e. the first years of retirement).

A reverse mortgage provides an available line of credit to pull from that is fixed (growing, actually) and not subject to the short-term volatility of the stock/bond markets. Retirees are therefore able to manage this sequence of return risk by having an alternative funding source in the bad years, giving their investment portfolio the time it needs to recover without having to access those investments at the wrong time. It is precisely the power of this potential retirement strategy that has some forward-thinking financial planners questioning why anyone who owns a home shouldn’t open a reverse mortgage in retirement, even if they never actually use it.

In a perfect world, after working for so many years, we would all have plenty of money for our retirement, and we would all be able to pass the family home on to the next generation without encumbrance. But, of course, we do not live in a perfect world, we live in the real world, and we need to be pragmatic about the options available to us. Reverse mortgages are not for everyone, and they are not a panacea for all of our financial shortcomings, but, in the right circumstances, they can truly be a god-send. It’s a nice bit of imagery really, if you think about it. Our home, which has provided shelter from so many storms throughout the years, in its last act of valor once again provides shelter, this time from the erosion of our financial assets, allowing us to live out our golden years with dignity and independence.