Don’t Fall for These 7 Social Security Myths

SSA-image-3My Comments: It must be Tuesday because here is something about Social Security. It’s an incredibly valuable and complex system, started over 80 years ago to provide a financial safety net for Americans who reach an age when working is/was not really an option. Today, society has evolved to where it’s a critical piece of the financial pie for almost everyone.

Many myths have surfaced during the years that influence are acceptance of it and how we should avail ourselves of the safety net. Here are seven.

BTW my next series of workshops on Social Security starts on October 11. Go here to see what it’s about and how to register.

By Jane Bennett Clark – Kiplinger, September 2016

Social Security provides critical benefits to more than 50 million people a year; almost 170 million workers contribute a chunk of their paycheck, to the tune of $900 billion annually, to keep those benefits flowing. You’d think with all the people and money involved that we’d all understand exactly how the program works.

Not so. The complexity of the system, its evolution and a shift in demographics that threatens its solvency have created confusion over what Social Security can and will deliver . . . and even whether it will continue to exist. Here are seven of the most common myths and misconceptions, along with explanations that set the record straight.

Social Security Will Go Broke Within the Next 20 Years

Social Security is essentially a pay-as-you-go system. Most everyone contributes 6.2% of each paycheck, and employers kick in an equal amount (self-employed folks pay the full 12.4%). As long as payroll taxes exist, Social Security will never go broke.

Until 2010, payroll taxes brought in more than enough to cover benefits for retirees and other recipients. The surplus went into a trust fund, which is invested in special Treasury securities. The fund also reaps interest on the securities plus taxes on the benefits of some beneficiaries.

Problem: In recent years, more money has gone out in benefits than has come in from payroll taxes. The government has been using the interest on the securities to cover the shortfall but will have to start redeeming the securities themselves by 2020. Failing a fix by Congress to raise taxes or cut benefits, or both, the trust fund will run out of money in 2034.

That doesn’t mean benefits will disappear altogether. Payroll taxes will still be enough to cover 79% of promised benefits. Will a 21% reduction in benefits really happen? Probably not. Much as Congress dislikes confronting hard choices, it is not likely to risk the reaction of millions of Social Security beneficiaries (read voters) to the idea of such a cut. Expect a solution to be pounded out long before 2034.

You Don’t Have to Pay Taxes on Social Security Benefits

For millions of beneficiaries, that’s wishful thinking. If your combined income—that is, adjusted gross income not including any Social Security benefits plus any nontaxable interest plus half your benefits—is between $25,000 and $34,000 for singles and $32,000 to $44,000 for couples filing jointly, you’ll owe taxes on up to 50% of your Social Security benefits. If your combined income exceeds the $34,000 limit for singles or the $44,000 limit for couples, you’ll owe tax on up to 85% of your benefits. Just over half of all beneficiaries paid federal tax on Social Security benefits in 2015.

You may also have to pay state taxes on part of your benefits. Four states—Minnesota, North Dakota, Vermont and West Virginia—tax up to 85% of Social Security benefits. Colorado, Connecticut, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Rhode Island and Utah also tax a portion of Social Security benefits but provide exemptions based on income or age.

Due to Social Security’s Shortfall, You Won’t Get Back the Dollars You Contributed to the System

Reality check: You don’t get back exactly what you put into the system anyway. Benefits are based on your 35 highest-earning years. But Social Security uses a progressive formula that replaces a higher portion of income for lower earners than for high earners—not a dollar-for-dollar match of what each worker pays in. Whether you’ll recoup more or less than the amount of tax you paid into the system depends on your earnings and how much tax you paid during your career, your age when you claim benefits, whether you’re married, and how long you (and your spouse) live to collect benefits.

Even if Social Security did pay a dollar-for-dollar match, the dollars you contributed are not stowed in your personal lock box, awaiting you at retirement. In fact, the money you paid went to fund someone else’s retirement; your benefits come from the payroll taxes of current workers.

Raising the Bar on Earnings Subject to Payroll Taxes Would Fix the System’s Shortfall

Under the current system, workers pay 6.2% of their wages, up to $118,500 in 2016, to fund Social Security benefits; employers kick in another 6.2%. If you’re self-employed, you pay the whole 12.4%, up to $118,500. (You and your employer also pay 1.45% each to fund Medicare Part A, which covers hospital stays. That tax has no income cap.) Some policymakers maintain that raising or eliminating the cap on payroll taxes would generate enough money to get the system back on track.

Not so, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a bipartisan policy group. Although removing the cap would significantly improve Social Security’s finances, it wouldn’t cover the shortfall altogether, partly because benefits are keyed to income. The higher the income subject to payroll tax, the higher the benefits paid out later to high earners (although not as much as the extra amount they put in), reducing the potential savings to the system.

If You Don’t Claim Benefits Early, You Risk Not Getting Your Fair Share

If you claim benefits as soon as you’re eligible, at 62, you get a 25% to 30% reduction in your benefit compared with what you’d get at full retirement age (66 for people born between 1943 and 1954; 67 for those born in 1960 and later). For every year you wait to take it after full retirement age, until you reach age 70, you get an 8% boost in benefits. Social Security actuaries calculate benefits with the goal of equalizing the total amount you get over your life expectancy whether you take benefits early, at full retirement age or at age 70. If you die before you reach your life expectancy, you won’t get your “fair” share regardless of when you claim Social Security. If you live longer than your life expectancy, you’ll get more than your allotted amount.

Fair or not, if you have reason to believe you won’t reach your life expectancy, you might as well take the benefit early and enjoy the money. If you think you’ll live well beyond your expected lifetime, you may be better off waiting until 70 because the bigger benefits over time will add up to much more than if you collected earlier, for a lower amount.

If You Take Social Security and Keep Working, You Must Give Back Most of Your Benefits

It’s true that Social Security beneficiaries younger than full retirement (currently 66) who keep working and earn more than the cap—$15,720 in 2016—lose $1 in benefits for every $2 they earn over that cap. But this rule, known as the earnings test, eases in the year you reach full retirement age. In that year, you give up $1 for every $3 you earn over a much larger cap—$41,880 in 2016—before the month you reach your full retirement age. Starting in the month of your birthday, there’s no limit on how much you can earn. Better yet, Social Security will adjust your benefits going forward with the goal of insuring that, over your life expectancy, you’ll be repaid every dime you lost to the earnings test.

Once You Start Taking Social Security, You Can’t Change Your Mind

Actually, you can, in a couple of circumstances.

Here’s the first scenario. Say you file for benefits at 62, when you first become eligible. Because you’re claiming before full retirement age (now 66), you get a 25% lifetime reduction in benefits. Then you get a windfall and no longer need the money. If you withdraw your application within the first 12 months of filing, you can pay back the benefits you’ve received, interest-free, and erase the 25% reduction. When you finally do claim benefits, you get whatever you’re due at the age you apply.

The second scenario: After claiming benefits early, you can ask Social Security to suspend your benefits once you reach full retirement age, up to age 70. You don’t have to pay back the benefits, but neither do you erase the fact you claimed early. Your future benefits will still start from a lower base, but that base can be pumped up by the 8%-a-year delayed-retirement credits you earn after age 66. So, while claiming at 62 cuts your benefits to 75% of the age 66 level, adding four years’ worth of delayed-retirement credits (32%) puts your age 70 benefit at 99% of your full retirement age check.

To learn more about either strategy, contact your local Social Security office and ask how to withdraw your application or suspend your benefit. Be aware that if you’re already enrolled in Medicare Part B, you’ll be billed for premiums that otherwise would have been subtracted from your Social Security paycheck.