Tag Archives: investment advice

Wealth Managers Enlist Savvy Spy Software to Map Portfolios

profit-loss-riskMy Comments: I’ve been playing this financial game now for almost 40 years. And like so much in today’s world, it’s very different today than it was then. Technology forces us to embrace new thoughts and ways to deal with so much in life.

When it comes to managing your money, my role as an investment advisor and financial planner causes me to try and stay at least near the front of the line, otherwise I’ll get left behind.

Much better returns on investment (ROI) can be had today, hypothetically, than we could have hoped for 30 years ago. Do you remember when interest rates less than 10% were thought to be ridiculous? Now we are living with interest rates near zero and have been for some time. So how is it possible to predict that a 10% ROI is reasonable today?

The following article talks about people of wealth that no one around here fully understands. And so for the rest of us, it’s kind of meaningless. Except when they talk about technology and how far its come so that mere mortals like us can benefit. Having access to these technologies can make a huge difference in your life.

Posted by Steven Maimes, Contributor – on August 5th, 2014
NYT article by Quentin Hardy

Some of the engineers who used to help the Central Intelligence Agency solve problems have moved on to another challenge: determining the value of every conceivable investment in the world.

Five years ago, they started a company called Addepar, with the aim of providing clear and reliable information about the increasingly complex assets inside pensions, investment funds and family fortunes. In much the way spies diagram a communications network, Addepar filters and weighs the relationships among billions of dollars of holdings to figure out whether a portfolio is about to crash.

Professional wealth managers are going to be seeing a lot more of big data. Last spring, Addepar raised a substantial sum to take this mainstream, and although it is not the only one bringing big data to a portfolio statement, its cast of characters sets it apart.

“One of the most foundational questions in finance is ‘What do I own, and what is all of this worth?’ ” said Eric Poirier, the chief executive of Addepar. “ ‘What is my risk?’ turns out to be an almost intractable problem.”

Although the list of wealth managers who use Addepar is confidential, Mr. Poirier says it has already grown from people like Joe Lonsdale, its tech-billionaire founder, and Iconiq Capital, which manages some of the Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg’s money, to include family offices, banks and investment managers at pension funds.

“In this state, some people are just getting wealthier,” said Joseph J. Piazza, chairman and chief executive of Robertson Stephens L.L.C., a San Francisco investment adviser that manages about $500 million using software from Addepar. Ten years ago, he said, “it might be a young entrepreneur with $50 million. Now it could be 10 times that, and they are thoughtful, bigger risk-takers.”

Investing used to be a relatively simple world of stocks, bonds and cash, with perhaps some real estate. But deregulation, globalization and computers have meant more choices. For a wealthy person, this could mean derivatives, private equity, venture capital, overseas markets and a host of other choices, like collectibles and Bitcoin.

And for all the computers on Wall Street’s trading floors, a lot of money management is surprisingly old-fashioned. Venture capitalists may invest in cutting-edge technology, but they sometimes still send out quarterly reports on paper. Financial custodians, which hold securities for people, often have custom-built computer systems. That makes it hard to compare a trade at one with a trade at another.

“The market is much more complicated than it used to be,” said David G. Tittsworth, president and chief executive of the Investment Adviser Association, a trade group of 550 registered firms. “The rich have bigger appetites for futures, commodities, alternative investments. There’s a lot of demand for helping them keep track of what their holdings actually are.”

Mr. Poirier, 32, a New Hampshire native who started a coding business at 14 before heading to Columbia University, worked on analyzing fixed-income products at Lehman Brothers from 2003 to 2006, before that Wall Street firm collapsed from mismanagement of its own risk. “Trying to figure out a yield, I’d work with a dozen different computer systems, with different interactions that people didn’t understand well,” he said.

He then took a job with Palantir Technologies, a company founded to enable military and intelligence agencies to make sense of disparate and incomplete data. He went on to build out Palantir’s commercial business, managing risk for things like JPMorgan Chase’s portfolio of subprime mortgages.

There were plenty of parallels between the two worlds, but instead of agencies, spies and eavesdropping satellites, finance has markets, investment advisers and portfolios. Both worlds are full of custom software, making each analysis of a data set unique. It is hard to get a single picture of anything like the truth.

Even a simple question like “How many shares of Apple do I own?” can be complicated, if some shares are held outright, some are inside a venture fund where the wealthy person is an investor and some are locked up in a company that Apple acquired.

Finance “was the same curve I encountered in the intelligence community,” Mr. Poirier said. “How do you make sense of diverse information from diverse sources, when the answer depends on who is asking the question?”

The parallel was also evident to Mr. Lonsdale, a Palantir co-founder. From an earlier stint at PayPal, he had millions in cash and on paper is a billionaire from his Palantir holdings. He also knew lots of other young people in tech who could not make sense of what was happening to their money. “Wealth management is designed for the 1950s, not this century,” he said.

Mr. Lonsdale left Palantir in 2009, starting Addepar with Jason Mirra, another Palantir employee, in 2009. “It didn’t make sense for Palantir to hire 20 or 30 people to work in an area like this,” Mr. Lonsdale said. Mr. Mirra is Addepar’s chief technical officer. Mr. Poirier joined in early 2013 and became chief executive later that year.

Besides Mr. Lonsdale, early investors in Addepar included Peter Thiel, a founder of both PayPal and Palantir. More money came from Palantir’s connections to hedge fund investors. Addepar’s $50 million funding round last May was led by David O. Sacks — another PayPal veteran, who sold a company called Yammer to Microsoft for $1.2 billion in 2012 — and Valor Equity Partners, a Chicago firm that has also invested in PayPal, SpaceX and Tesla Motors, among other companies.

Despite the pedigree, Mr. Lonsdale says Addepar, which has 109 employees, is not meant just as a tool for rich tech executives or family money. They are, he said, “just the early adopters.”
Karen White, Addepar’s president and chief operating officer, says a typical customer has investments at five to 15 banks, stockbrokers or other investment custodians.

Addepar charges based on how much data it is reviewing. Ms. White said Addepar’s service typically started at $50,000, but can go well over $1 million, depending on the money and investment variables involved.

And in much the way Palantir seeks to find common espionage themes, like social connections and bomb-making techniques, among its data sources, Mr. Lonsdale has sought to reduce financial information to a dozen discrete parts, like price changes and what percentage of something a person holds.

As a computer system learns the behavior of a certain asset, it begins to build a database of probable relationships, like what a bond market crisis might mean for European equities. “A lot of computer science, machine learning, can be applied to that,” Mr. Lonsdale said. “There are lessons from Palantir about how to do this.”

A number of other firms are also trying to map what everything in a diverse portfolio is worth. One of the largest, Advent Software, in 2011 paid $73 million for Black Diamond, a company that, like Addepar, uses cloud technology to increase its computing power and more easily draw from several databases at once.

“We’ve been chipping at the problem for 30 years,” said Peter Hess, Advent’s president and chief executive. “There is a lot more complexity now, and the modernization of expectations about how things should work is led by the new tech money. But because of Apple and Google, even my parents have expectations about how easy tech ought to be.”

New Longevity Annuity Rules: 5 Things to Know

retirement-exit-2My Comments: Earlier this week I introduced the idea of a QLAC. If you didn’t see it, click on the link and check it out.

Some of you are going to want to use this contract as soon as it becomes available this fall. Others are going to think about how your investment mix will change today so that money in a QLAC is maximized by the time you are 85 years old.

Another reason for consideration is that while annuities are a contentious topic, they have their advantages. Some advisors swear by them; others say the fees will kill you. In my opinion, they have their uses when clients are fearful of how life might play out and the insurance element built into annuities provides a peace of mind dividend that can be found in no other product or investment.

What these new rules do not appear to include are 403(b) accounts, which are very common here in Gainesville. That’s because a 403(b) is a generic equivalent of a 401(k), but for the non-profit world only, such as the University of Florida or Santa Fe College. The answer may be to transfer money out of your 403(b) into an IRA at retirement, with up to 25% going into a QLAC.

By Nick Thornton July 15, 2014

Retirement account holders can now put 25% of their money in QLACs.

In recognition of the reality that many Americans will live well into their 80s, the Department of Treasury recently issued final rules making Deferred Income Annuities more accessible to those with good genes and perhaps inadequate savings.

The rules could be a game changer for how boomers, and their advisors, allocate 401(k) and IRA assets going forward.

Here is a breakdown of the core provisions to the new regulations governing DIAs.

1. Defined contribution participants and IRA owners are now allowed to invest up to 25% of their account balances, or up to $125,000, in qualifying longevity annuity contracts, or QLACs. That money will not be subject to the annual minimum distribution requirements governing 401(k) and individual retirement accounts that begin at age 70 1/2.

2. Longevity annuities will distribute cash at a set age, typically by 80 or 85. If the owner of the annuity happens to die before they begin to receive benefits from the annuities, all is not lost. The principal and premiums paid on the contract will be returned to the retirement account, where the money is subject to the same laws governing the inheritance of retirement accounts.

3. In the event that investors, and or their advisors, inadvertently distribute more than the 25 percent limit to a deferred annuity, the IRS will allow the mistake to be corrected without disqualifying the annuity contract.

4. Lump-sum investments can be made into QLACs, or, salary deferrals can be incrementally made into the contracts, much as they are with a 401(k) plan.

5. Ultimately, the cash value of QLACs is subtracted from the rest of a retiree’s assets in a 401(k) or IRA when determining the required minimum distributions when they take effect.

Sensible Expectations for Inflation

retirement_roadMy Comments: When I talk with prospective clients and those already clients, I talk about existential risk. These are risks that may or may not happen, depending on any number of variables. One of them is inflation since it reduces the purchasing power of your dollars over time.

Another existential risk is the financial burden imposed on a family whenever someone needs long term care. The odds are high it will happen for 60% to 75% of us. However, if you simply die before the need for long term care happens, then the risk disappears.

Inflation risk is far less existential, if you expect to live a long and happy life, chances are good it will be there, with the only question being how much inflation. Having solutions in place that mitigate the risk makes sense.

Managing expectations is also an important part of financial planning. Growing your money over time at a rate that exceeds the rate of inflation goes a long way to helping you maintain your standard of living going forward.

posted by Jeffrey Dow Jones July 24,2014 in Cognitive Concord

One of the things I’ve been watching closely over the last few months is inflation. Not for the reasons you might be thinking — I’m not one of these inflation truthers banging that tired old drum that inflation is higher than being reported. I don’t think there’s a big conspiracy out there about the CPI. All things considered, and as complicated as it is to calculate, it’s actually a really good data point.

One of the early themes of this newsletter, way back in 2009, was that inflation wasn’t something to worry about. Longtime readers may remember The Inflation Chupacabra with fondness. The basic premise was: I’ll believe it when somebody brings me solid evidence. Five years later, I’m still waiting.

It’s possible – possible — that may be changing.

What I’m really watching right now is wage inflation. Because without a significant and sustained pickup in wages, you can’t get a significant and sustained pickup in prices. The one supports the other. For some reason, there’s this myth out there in certain circles where, in this decade of stagnant income, systemic inflation can run at 5 or 10% per year. It can’t. Some goods can increase in price at a dramatic rate. But not systemic prices, not unless the wages supporting those prices also rise.

Wage inflation is unquestionably picking up a little bit, but it’s not significant enough to set the sirens blaring. We still have a long way to go before reaching levels of concern. I posted this chart from Deutsche Bank’s Torsten Slok a few weeks ago:
CONTINUE-READING

3 Market Warning Signs Predict 20% Stock Tumble

My Comments: No need for any commentary from me. Just draw your own conclusions, and hope that if the author is right, you’ve talked with me about how to make money when everyone around you is losing theirs.

On the other hand, essentially this same argument was made last April and yet the crash has not happened. Yet.  Another example of the boogyman creating uncertainty. All you can do is be prepared, which I hope you are.

MarketWatch commentary by Mark Hulbert / August 3, 2014

Over the past 45 years, the stock market has lost more than 20% each time three warning signs flashed simultaneously.

After a selloff this past week dragged the Dow Jones Industrial Average into negative territory for the year, it’s worth noting that all three are flashing today.

The signals are excessive levels of bullish enthusiasm; significant overvaluation, based on measures like price/earnings ratios; and extreme divergences in the performances of different market sectors.

They have gone off in unison six times since 1970, according to Hayes Martin, president of Market Extremes, an investment consulting firm in New York whose research focus is major market turning points.

Bear in the air

The S&P 500’s average subsequent decline on those earlier occasions was 38%, with the smallest drop at 22%. A bear market is considered a selloff of at least 20%, with bull markets defined as rallies of at least 20%.

In fact, no bear market has occurred without these three signs flashing at the same time. Once they do, the average length of time to the beginning of a decline is about one month, according to Martin.

The first two of these three market indicators — an overabundance of bulls and overvaluation of stocks — have been present for several months. Back in December, for example, the percentage of advisers who described themselves as bullish rose above 60%, a level Investors Intelligence, an investment service, considers “danger territory.” Its latest reading, as of Wednesday, was 56%.

Also beginning late last year, the price/earnings ratio for the Russell 2000 index of smaller-cap stocks, after excluding negative earnings, rose to its highest level since the benchmark was created in 1984 — higher even than at the October 2007 bull-market high or the March 2000 top of the Internet bubble.

Three strikes and you’re out

The third of Martin’s trio of bearish omens emerged just recently, which is why in late July he advised clients to sell stocks and hold cash. That’s when the fraction of stocks participating in the bull market, which already had been slipping, declined markedly.

One measure of this waning participation is the percentage of stocks trading above an average of their prices over the previous four weeks. Among stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange, this proportion fell from 82% at the beginning of July to just 50% on the day the S&P 500 hit its all-time high.

It was one of “the sharpest breakdowns in market breadth that I’ve ever seen in so short a period of time,” Martin says.

Another sign of diverging market sectors: When the S&P 500 hit its closing high on July 24, it was ahead 1.4% for the month, in contrast to a 3.1% decline for the Russell 2000.

Expect up to a 20% S&P 500 decline

How big of a decline is likely? Martin’s best guess is a loss of between 13% and 20% for the S&P 500, less than the 38% average decline following past occasions when his triad of unfavorable indicators was present. The reason? He expects the Federal Reserve to quickly “step in to provide extreme liquidity to blunt the decline.”

To be sure, Martin focuses on a small sample, which makes it difficult to draw robust statistical conclusions. But David Aronson, a former finance professor at Baruch College in New York who now runs a website that makes complex statistical tests available to investors, says that this limitation is unavoidable when focusing on past market tops, since “by definition it will involve a small sample.”

He says that he has closely analyzed Martin’s research and takes his forecast of a market drop “very seriously.”

Martin says that expanding his sample isn’t possible because most of his current indicators didn’t exist before the 1970s and “the comparative math gets very unreliable.” But he says he does use several statistical techniques for dealing with small samples that increase his confidence in the conclusions that his research draws.

Russell 2000 could take 30% hit

He says stocks with smaller market capitalizations will be the hardest hit in the decline he is anticipating, in part because they currently are so overvalued. He forecasts that the Russell 2000 will fall by as much as 30%.

Also among the hardest-hit stocks during a decline will be those with the highest “betas” — that is, those with the most pronounced historical tendencies to rise or fall by more than the overall market. Martin singles out semiconductors in particular — and technology stocks generally — as high-beta sectors.

He predicts that blue-chip stocks, particularly those that pay a large dividend, will lose the least in any decline. One exchange-traded fund that invests in such stocks is iShares Select Dividend, which charges annual expenses of 0.40%, or $40 per $10,000 invested.

The average dividend yield of the stocks the fund owns is 3%; that yield is calculated by dividing a company’s annual dividend by its stock price. Though the fund’s yield is higher than the S&P 500’s 2% yield, it nevertheless pursues a defensive strategy. It invests in the highest-dividend-paying blue-chip stocks only after excluding firms whose five-year dividend growth rate is negative, those whose dividends as a percentage of earnings per share exceed 60% and those whose average daily trading volume is less than 200,000 shares.

The consumer-staples sector has also held up relatively well during past declines. The Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF currently has a dividend yield of 2.5% and an annual expense ratio of 0.16%.

If the broad market’s loss is in the 13%-to-20% range that Martin anticipates, and you have a large amount of unrealized capital gains in your taxable portfolio, you could lose in taxes what you gain by selling to sidestep the decline. But the larger losses he anticipates for smaller-cap stocks could be big enough to justify selling and paying the taxes on your gains.

Increased Consumer Spending Driving Strong Economic Growth In USA

USA EconomyMy Comments: On Thursday, July 30 the market dropped 300 points. The blogosphere and media were all a chatter about “was this the start of the correction?”. Who knows ?!?

It illustrates why those of us who profess to be financial advisors are more in the dark than you are. Here we are talking about a looming market correction, one that will happen, and the longer it takes to start the more violent it is likely to be. And here I am this morning, coming to you with good news about the economy. Seems totally weird, doesn’t it?

What has to be remembered is that the markets are always forward looking. I want to invest my money before it goes up, if at all possible. If I think it’s going to crater, I’m taking my money out. At least that’s the plan, unless you use some of the approaches favored by us at Florida Wealth Advisors, LLC.

What this headline tells me is that when the correction happens, it will be relatively short term and though perhaps dramatic, it will not be systemic.

Jul. 31, 2014 / APAC Investment News

Summary
• The Bureau of Economic Analysis is reporting 4 percent growth in the second quarter, a strong rebound from the first quarter.
• Consumer spending in both durable and non-durable goods is up. Both exports and imports also rose, along with most other indicators.
• This economic growth should provide some upward pressure for markets, at least in the short term.

The United States has struggled to fully recover from the 2008 Financial Crisis. While stock markets have rebounded, unemployment has remained high and economic growth has been tepid. New data points to the U.S. economy growing a solid 4 percent in the second quarter, however, propelled by an increase in consumer spending. This should help stabilize markets and perhaps even push them higher.

With consumer spending accounting for roughly 2/3rds of America’s economy, any increase in consumer spending should come as a relief for those concerned of yet another slowdown. Still, stock markets hovered in place following the release of the data on Wednesday, likely over concerns about the Fed’s next move with interest rates and the continued wind down of its asset buying program.

Consumer Spending On The Rise
According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis consumer spending increased a solid 2.5 percent in the second quarter, up from 1.2 percent in the first quarter. Durable goods, which includes automobiles, appliances, and other similar goods, increased by an astounding 14 percent, compared with an increase of just 3.2 percent in the first quarter. Non-durable goods, which includes food and clothing, increased by 2.5 percent. The BEA presents its numbers in seasonally adjusted annual rates.

Automobiles have been performing particularly well as of late, even while General Motors is still feeling the fallout from a major scandal and many automakers are suffering a rash of recalls. There were some fears of a major slowdown following the economic contraction in the first quarter, but for now it appears that the feared slow down hasn’t materialized.

Ford did suffer a decline in sales in June, falling some 5.8 percent YOY. While this may not seem like good news, the drop was not as bad as expected. Meanwhile, General Motors sales rose 1 percent even in spite of the bad publicity from the ignition scandal, and Chrysler posted a solid 9.2 gain.

Growth Being Driven By Other Factors
Besides consumer spending, other areas of the economy have also performed well. Exports rose by 9.5 percent, following a sharp decline of 9.2 percent in the first quarter. This suggests that the global economy may also be growing. Imports also rose 11.7 percent, compared with an increase of only 2.2 percent in the first quarter.

Investment in equipment rose 7 percent, while investments in non-residential structures rose by 5.3 percent.

Interestingly, federal government consumption actually decreased by .8 percent, suggesting that the rise in spending is being driven by private businesses and consumers. This should come as a welcome sign given the government’s high debt burden. Simply put, the American government likely couldn’t afford to drive up consumption even if it wanted to.

Strong Economic Growth Should Re-enforce Markets
For now, strong economic growth should keep markets buoyant even with many factors exerting downward pressures. Sanctions on Russia, tensions in the South China Seas, political infighting in Congress, the possible fallout of the Fed curtailment of its asset buying program, and numerous other factors have created jitters. Strong economic growth can counteract these downward pressures, at the very least.

Meanwhile, as stock indexes have surged to all time highs, there have been some concerns that a bubble may be building. While stock markets have been performing well, the economy in general seemed to be suffering from sluggish growth, suggesting that something besides actual economic performance has been driving stock prices upwards. Now, however, economic growth finally appears to be in line with the rising stock market indexes.

So long as the economy continues to grow, markets should remain stable. Of course, the economy itself could quickly swing back into contraction. Government debt levels remain high, profits can evaporate over night, and consumer sentiments can change quickly.

Further, as the economy continues to grow, the Fed will almost certainly continue to cut back its stimulus measures, and eventually even raise interest rates. This, in turn, could slow economic growth. Meanwhile, stagnant wages, continued high unemployment, high debt levels, and other factors could eventually pose a threat.

Stocks Will Rise And The 3 Trades You Can’t Make

My Comments: Once again, the question of a market crash raises its ugly head. And once again, no one has a clue when it will happen.

And once again, as I tell my clients and prospective clients, it really doesn’t matter if you have your money where it can grow regardless of when and how severe the coming crash.

The author includes among his 3 Trades… something you CAN participate in if you have access to the tactical approach to investing that I recommend for all my clients. Some of you know what I’m talking about. The rest of you will have to call or send me an email.

By Lance Roberts   Jul. 18, 2014

I wrote recently that stocks spend 5% of their time hitting new highs while the other 95% of the time investors spend in the market has been making up losses. This is shown in the chart below.
I make this point as I saw a flashing banner across the bottom of the TV screen stating the markets have hit 14 new highs this year alone. While this sounds like an amazing feat, it is actually just a function of being in record territory. For example, assume a dragster sets a record in the 1/4 mile of 7 seconds. The next driver that runs the same strip at 6.999 seconds sets a new record. So forth, and so on. There are two important points to take away from this:
1. When the markets are at a record level, it only takes infinitesimal advances to set new records.
2. Records are attained when previous extremes have been breached which is generally a later stage event.

However, while logic would suggest that current market levels are getting extreme, the “exuberance” created by current price momentum fuels additional gains. As the ongoing “bullish meme” from mainstream media sources and analysts continue to feed individual’s “confirmation biases” the “fear” of “missing out” blinds individuals of the rising risk.

Dr. Robert Shiller recently penned an interesting piece at Project Syndicate stating:
“In recent months, concern has intensified among the world’s financial experts and news media that overheated asset markets – real estate, equities, and long-term bonds – could lead to a major correction and another economic crisis. The general public seems unbothered: Google Trends shows some pickup in the search term “stock market bubble,” but it is not at its peak 2007 levels, and “housing bubble” searches are relatively infrequent.”

Dr. Shiller is correct. The general public seems “unbothered” by the rising risks in the markets despite a variety of warnings recently:

Janet Yellen during in the Federal Reserve’s Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress: “The Committee recognizes that low interest rates may provide incentives for some investors to ‘reach for yield,’ and those actions could increase vulnerabilities in the financial system to adverse events…In some sectors, such as lower-rated corporate debt, valuations appear stretched and issuance has been brisk.”

Stanley Druckenmiller and Carl Icahn via the CNBC Delivering Alpha conference:
“I am fearful that today our obsession with what will happen to markets and the economy in the near term is causing us to misjudge the accumulation of much greater long-term risks to our economy” – Druckenmiller

“You have to worry about the excessive printing of money. You have to be worried about the markets.” – Icahn

Yet, despite these warnings individuals, as shown below, are as heavily allocated to the markets currently as they were prior to the financial crisis. (Note: there are more charts in the original article which I am not adding here. If you need to see them, here is a link to the original text: http://seekingalpha.com/article/2322275-stocks-will-rise-and-the-3-trades-you-cant-make )

Furthermore, while individual investors are fully allocated to the equity markets, professional investor sentiment has rocketed in recent weeks to astronomically high levels.

While excessive bullish sentiment, low volatility, and a perceived blindness to risk are certainly noteworthy; “irrational exuberance” can drive markets higher in the short term for much longer than most expect.

There is currently a belief that there is no recession on the horizon, that markets are “fairly valued” based on the current interest rate environment, and there is “no other option but stocks.” While these views certainly bolster the near term perspective of being long the equities, which will continue to drive asset prices higher, it is important to remember that each of these dynamics can, and do, change much more rapidly than investors can generally react to.

The chart below shows the annual change in GDP, 10-year interest rates and the S&P 500. It is important to note that prior to every recession that was an instilled belief that “no recession” was on the horizon. It is worth remembering that Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke both stated that the economy was doing well…just before it wasn’t.

It was in 1996 that Alan Greenspan first uttered the words ‘irrational exuberance’ but it was four more years before the ‘bull mania’ was completed. The ‘mania’ of crowds can last far longer than logic would dictate and especially when that mania is supported by artificial supports.

The statistical data suggests that the next economic recession will likely begin in 2016 with a negative market shock occurring late that year, or in 2017. This would also correspond with the historical precedent of when recessions tend to begin during the decennial cycle. As shown in the chart below the 3rd, 7th and 10th years of the cycle have the highest occurrence of recession starts.

With the Fed’s artificial interventions suppressing interest rates and inflation it is likely that the bullish mania will continue into 2015 as the ‘herd’ mentality is sucked into the bullish vortex. This is already underway as shown recently in ‘Charts All Market Bulls Should Consider’ which showed individuals are once again piling into stocks and depleting cash reserves in the hopes of ‘getting rich quick.

The 3 Trades You Can’t Make
As a money manager, my portfolio model remains currently fully invested. The problem is that I am grossly uncomfortable with that allocation given the risks that currently prevail. However, as I have stated many times previously, I must follow the trend of the market or I will suffer “career risk” as clients move money elsewhere to chase market returns. This is what I call the “investor duration mismatch.” While investors are supposed to be investing for long-term returns, buying low and selling high, the reality is that their emotional biases make them extremely myopic to short-term market movements. The problem with short-term market movements is that they have NOTHING to do with underlying fundamentals. (Read more on why fundamentals don’t matter.)

The problem for investors today is that the “easy money” is no longer available by betting on stocks going up. Which means there is an opportunity brewing in three areas which, unfortunately, investors cannot actually make.

• Long Volatility (NYSEARCA:VXX)
• Long Bonds (Investment Grade Corporates)
• Short Stocks

The reason I say that you can’t make these trades is that they are a bet on the eventual market reversion. When the reversion occurs volatility will significantly rise, interest rates will decline stock prices drop markedly. The problem is that most investors do not have the patience to let such a “bet” mature. The pressure of betting against a rising market will eventually lead to selling at painful losses.

The current low-volume market, combined with excessive bullish sentiment, sets up a potential for asset prices to be inflated further. As stated, the risks in the markets have clearly risen, but the next major reversion could be many months away. The problem for most, particularly those touting “investing for the long term,” is when the “dip” turns into a full-fledged “decline” the panic to exit the markets will become overwhelming.

Dr. Shiller’s final paragraph summed things up well:
“Those who warn of grave dangers if speculative price increases are allowed to continue unimpeded are right to do so, even if they cannot prove that there is any cause for concern. The warnings might help prevent the booms that we are now seeing from continuing much longer and becoming more dangerous.”

Our memories tend to be much shorter than the damage done to portfolios by failing to recognize risk and managing accordingly.

(My final note: Risk is not something to be avoided; it is something to be understood and managed. If you want to know how this is done, call me or send me an email. – TK )

The Hangover

My Comments: The blogosphere and financial press is increasingly filled with questions and presumed answers about the amount of time since the last market correction. The focus of each writers attention is to suggest doom is imminent or doom is not imminent. Personally, I have no idea when the next crash will happen, just that sooner or later it will.

That being said, here are comments from one of the bright lights at one of the best well lit family of funds available to us. Draw your own conclusions, but if you agree with me that something ominous will happen before long, then talk to me about ways to limit your losses when it does happen.

by Scott Minerd July 24, 2014

The Fed’s not taking the punch bowl from the party, but investors should be wary of the hangover.

On a fall night in 1955, Federal Reserve Chairman William McChesney Martin stood before a group of New York investment bankers at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel and delivered what is now considered his famous “punch bowl” speech. It earned this label because Martin closed his eloquent talk by paraphrasing a writer who described the role of the Fed as being “in the position of the chaperone who has ordered the punch bowl removed just when the party was really warming up.”

Janet Yellen’s recent congressional testimony suggested that she does not subscribe to her predecessor’s temperance. While citing that valuations in certain sectors, such as high-yield or technology stocks, appeared “substantially stretched”, Yellen’s overall sentiment was clear: the Fed does not view the party as really warming up to the point that the punch bowl need be removed.

The excessive risk taking among investors lulled into complacency by an overly loose Fed is a powerful cocktail indeed; one that could produce a hangover in the form of volatility. Having said that, the Fed’s party can still go on for a long time. As I’ve said before, bull markets don’t die of old age, but because of an exogenous event or a policy mistake.

In his famous speech, Martin preceded his punchbowl comment by saying, on behalf of the Fed, “…precautionary action to prevent inflationary excesses is bound to have some onerous effects…” The flipside – a lack of precautionary action by the Fed – will have its own set of consequences in time. It is very difficult to say when exactly these will happen, but near-term indicators suggest the hangover won’t hit while you’re relaxing at the beach this summer.

Chart of the Week
Equity Markets: The Bigger they Come the Harder they Fall
The S&P500 has now gone nearly 800 days since a correction of more than 10 percent – the “meaningful” level for many analysts. The more extended the market becomes, the larger the eventual decline may be. Over the last 50 years, the longer the time between market corrections, the steeper the drop once the correction does occur.

EX-RECESSION S&P500 CORRECTIONS (>10% DECLINE) SINCE 1962